Strong againstAggregated data
SpikeWR 54.7% vs 48.6% exp. · 2.5K games+4.9 ppmedium sample
ColtWR 50.6% vs 47.3% exp. · 8.7K games+3.2 ppsolid sample
LolaWR 50.7% vs 45.6% exp. · 511 games+3.0 ppmedium sample
RicoWR 53.2% vs 49.8% exp. · 6.3K games+3.0 ppsolid sample
GeneWR 51.9% vs 48.8% exp. · 8.5K games+2.9 ppsolid sample
BeaWR 51.6% vs 46.9% exp. · 527 games+2.6 ppmedium sample
LeonWR 48.2% vs 45.8% exp. · 8K games+2.3 ppsolid sample
SiriusWR 48.6% vs 46.0% exp. · 1.1K games+2.2 ppmedium sample
NaniWR 50.7% vs 47.9% exp. · 1.9K games+2.2 ppmedium sample
EveWR 48.6% vs 45.9% exp. · 503 games+2.0 ppmedium sample
ByronWR 51.5% vs 49.7% exp. · 3.3K games+1.5 ppmedium sample
MicoWR 47.7% vs 46.2% exp. · 820 games+1.5 ppmedium sampleStruggles againstAggregated data
FangWR 42.2% vs 49.5% exp. · 1.2K games−4.5 ppmedium sample
ColetteWR 41.3% vs 46.8% exp. · 3.8K games−4.4 ppsolid sample
CordeliusWR 44.4% vs 50.3% exp. · 983 games−3.5 ppmedium sample
PierceWR 46.2% vs 49.9% exp. · 5K games−3.2 ppsolid sample
OtisWR 45.4% vs 49.2% exp. · 3.9K games−3.1 ppsolid sample
ClancyWR 40.9% vs 48.9% exp. · 571 games−3.1 ppmedium sample
BullWR 44.3% vs 48.2% exp. · 2.2K games−2.7 ppmedium sample
MeepleWR 45.4% vs 48.4% exp. · 3.1K games−2.3 ppmedium sample
ChesterWR 44.1% vs 47.1% exp. · 2.9K games−2.1 ppmedium sample
TickWR 42.2% vs 48.3% exp. · 533 games−2.1 ppmedium sample
LilyWR 46.8% vs 50.2% exp. · 926 games−1.9 ppmedium sample
CrowWR 42.2% vs 44.5% exp. · 4.7K games−1.7 ppsolid sample
ShadeWR 41.5% vs 45.5% exp. · 1.1K games−1.7 ppmedium sampleGrouped from approved brawler classifications · overall ranked 3v3 only.
Strong against archetypes
Struggles against archetypes
No clear disadvantages in the current sample
All matchups available in this snapshot, with at least 500 games per pair. Delta is adjusted by both brawlers’ strength and shown in percentage points (pp) over the expected win rate.