Amber is strong against
Aggregated dataEach row shows the adjusted effect in percentage points (pp): regularized pair win rate − expected win rate, shrunk by sample confidence. It is not the direct subtraction on the row, and the edge is relative to expected — it does not guarantee a win rate above 50%.
Amber struggles against
Aggregated dataEach row shows the adjusted effect in percentage points (pp): regularized pair win rate − expected win rate, shrunk by sample confidence. It is not the direct subtraction on the row, and the deficit is relative to expected — it does not guarantee a win rate below 50%.
BelleWR 50.0% vs 54.2% exp. · 938 rounds−3.1 ppmedium sample
PiperWR 50.5% vs 53.7% exp. · 2.2K roundsWin rate above 50%−2.8 ppmedium sample
ByronWR 54.5% vs 56.8% exp. · 1.5K roundsWin rate above 50%−2.4 ppmedium sample
El PrimoWR 47.6% vs 51.7% exp. · 628 rounds−2.2 ppmedium sample
MandyWR 54.5% vs 56.5% exp. · 2.1K roundsWin rate above 50%−2.2 ppmedium sample
NajiaWR 49.4% vs 52.1% exp. · 1.5K rounds−2.1 ppmedium sample
WendyWR 57.0% vs 57.7% exp. · 588 roundsWin rate above 50%−2.0 ppmedium sample
BuzzWR 55.5% vs 56.7% exp. · 815 roundsWin rate above 50%−2.0 ppmedium sample
CarlWR 53.2% vs 55.1% exp. · 1.1K roundsWin rate above 50%−2.0 ppmedium sample
LouWR 50.8% vs 52.6% exp. · 3.8K roundsWin rate above 50%−1.7 ppsolid sample
LumiWR 56.9% vs 57.7% exp. · 1.3K roundsWin rate above 50%−1.7 ppmedium sample
EdgarWR 48.8% vs 50.7% exp. · 2.9K rounds−1.6 ppmedium sample
ShadeWR 61.5% vs 61.4% exp. · 1.5K roundsWin rate above 50%−1.5 ppmedium sampleGrouped from approved brawler classifications · overall ranked 3v3 only.
Strong against archetypes
No clear advantages in the current sample
Struggles against archetypes
All matchups available in this snapshot, with at least 500 rounds per pair. Delta is adjusted by both brawlers’ strength, shrunk by sample confidence, and shown in percentage points (pp) over the expected win rate.